User talk:Nathan
From BluWiki
|
|
Talk Page
[edit] Link SpamHi there... here's more spam to clean up ..thanks http://wine.bluwiki.com/ ; http://wildplum.bluwiki.com/go/User:Wildplum --wildplum 22:15, 4 January 2008 (EST)
[edit] microchip08You can keep whatever templates you want! Microchip08 11:36, 7 January 2008 (EST)
[edit] Mini HolidayHey Nathan, I'd just wanted to inform you I'm away on holiday for the next 10 days, thus cut-off from the net. Anyway nothing much goes on here usually so it should be fine with one less sysop around. Thanks --KaiAdin 20:38, 10 January 2008 (EST)
[edit] Image:Pandora7.jpgAh yes the good ol Time Cube Theory of everything, I don't really know what to make of it (the theory), but considering the image uploaded and its formatting in relation to the comments, this page may actually be spam. --KaiAdin 03:13, 24 January 2008 (EST)
[edit] Shock SitesHi! It seems like ages ago (Sept 2007) that the spam filter went up - unfortunately, it took down the 'shock sites' page (since that has links to shock sites). I was wondering if anyone has worked how to make the filter not-apply to every page? I'm sure it wouldn't be too difficult? (unless it is felt that the 'shock sites' page isn't suitable on Bluwiki?. Shocker 03:06, 27 January 2008 (EST)
[edit] Re: Lame! + Holiday + Vandalism DefinitionYep, I was back a long time ago, I just forgot about that message in my Talk page. As for Advanced Marketing Chat... yea, if only we had checkuser, but they technically haven't done anything too wrong, maybe minor vandalism, at least whoever it is replied to the posts (even though it wasn't in a positive manner). Allowing 'General Discussion' seems to always be a ticket for general mayhem in chatrooms and such. I think, for users reference we need to define Vandalism in Bluwiki and make it onto a page like BluWiki:Link Spam. For a wiki page building upon the definition of 'defacement of property or an object' would an appropriate definition be 'Any non-constructive edits, that go against the theme or topic of a page' -- Any suggestions? Because Wikipedia's definition may not be totally appropriate considering, we don't need a level of integrity an encyclopedia needs. Thanks, once again --KaiAdin 14:43, 14 February 2008 (EST)
[edit] Vandal vandalising my articleHi Nathan. Could you help me to block this user IP - 202.190.154.182 (talk • cont. • logs) - as he has vandalise my article, Survivor: Singapore, twice and he is likely to vandalise anytime soon, but not sure when (probably this month). I hope that you can block him with the max. possible "blocking" sentence so that i will feel that my article will feel safe on Bluwiki. Thank you. Aranho 10:22, 3 March 2008 (EST)
[edit] Protecting a pageHi Nathan. I'm one of the more active people on the Packrat portion of the wiki. We've got a few vandals on the main page there and I was wondering if we could get protection for that page for those that don't have an account in the system (no anonymous edits, in other words). We had this guy come through: http://packrat.bluwiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=147.70.153.74 Plus, we've had a few others in the past. If it's not worthy of protection, I understand. Just trying to help out our growing community :) Timdorr 11:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
[edit] Your signatureI just want to let you know that the recent server upgrade broke your signature -- the symbol preceding your name renders as a question mark in a black square in Firefox (indicates an error when trying to decode the character), and it is mildly distracting on talk pages. nneonneo talk 01:51, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
[edit] IRC?Oh I didn't know that Bluwiki had an IRC channel, someone seems to have already registered KaiAdin there so I think Ill use AdinKai... --KaiAdin 06:53, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
|






